Hollywood is in love with Washington politics. Oh it’s nothing new; celebrities have been endorsing democrat and republican candidates for years. Quite frankly, I always found celebrity endorsement over rated and obnoxious for both sides. It’s just another way for a celebrity to gain attention and get invited to a White House dinner.

This season however, democrat celebrity endorsements have an unusual array of anti-big money communists supporting big money and bigger money celebrities Americans can’t go through life without the advice of.

The most famous endorsement is Senator Obama’s plug by the queen of brainless TV-watching women—Oprah Winfrey. Ah yes, Oprah, the woman who tells women what book to read, what bra to buy—only if she wears the brand—what man to marry, even though Oprah won’t marry the man she
prefers to live with out of wedlock, how to think, feel, act, and live. Now the queen of talk will decide who American daytime TV junkies should vote for as president.

According to Oprah, Senator Barack Obama is the only candidate who has “vision.”Yes, visions of doing nothing but talk since he was elected to the Illinois Senate seven years ago. Blank records in politics are so important. Who wants a politician with experience?

Barack Obama, whose name rhymes with Osama, is not the only celeb-endorsed candidate; John Edwards has some special help from Hugo Chavez’s best buddy Harry Belafonte. That’s right; the communist-supporter who hates America and its capitalist society is endorsing the king of
capitalism with money. Perhaps John Edwards can throw old Harry and friends a big expensive party at his big expensive house across the street from the poor low-income trailer park Edwards and democrats ignore.

Poor people never make anyone look good, so just ignore them and maybe they’ll go away.

I thought democrats loved the poor? I thought celebrities adore the poor?

Hillary Clinton has the biggest money endorsement of all since a criminal named Norman Hsu wrote her a big check from stolen money—Warren Buffet. I guess the man who loves to give money to those in need wants to support the woman who wants those in need to stay in need and beholden to her socialist agenda that has no answer for helping the needy.

Nice Warren. You couldn’t have picked anyone better to take your money and run than the family who loves stealing other people’s money to fund themselves. At least Roger won’t go without this year; he’ll definitely be having a “white” Christmas.

The Democrat Party is the party of poverty. Without poor people, democrats are out of business, which is why they adhere to the sociology concept of Substantive Democracy: the idea that democracy is a failure if a socioeconomic underclass develops in non-white races and the female gender, denying these lowly classes democratic human rights.

This ideal firmly took hold during LBJ’s Great Society when blacks were convinced only democrats were on their side as rich white democrats forced blacks into housing projects were whites did not live. Thus the new modern plantation and reinstitution of slavery took hold to create a socioeconomic underclass democrats need for votes.

You have to admit democrats know how to win an election: steal from the poor to buy your way into Washington.

This socioeconomic low-income group still abides by democrat law, staying in their rightful lowly place of welfare recipient, uneducated, oh-woe-is-me world created by liberals who need poor and dumb to get themselves ahead. Without the socioeconomic underclass, John Edwards would not have his 29,000 square foot mansion to house his fabulous hair and Hillary would
never have made it to the Senate without poor people voting her whore of a husband to the presidency she is trying to con the poor and all women into handing over to her.

And with Warren’s money, she’ll steal her way through his pockets and democrat voters to get her feet back in the people’s House. But it’s the Oprah endorsement that is holding the biggest power over how people think. Oprah has crowned herself E.F. Hutton: when she talks, women listen.

And they do what they are told according to the latest reports of her Obama campaign speak. I’m sure we won’t be seeing Hillary and Oprah dining together soon. After all, who can get women to vote; Oprah or Warren?

And Oprah knows how to make sure women will vote for Obama:

All who attended last weeks Obama’s rally in Iowa to hear Oprah speak were not allowed to enter without signing a statement that included their name, address, phone number and promissory signature stating they would volunteer for Barack Obama’s campaign.

In other words; no one was allowed to hear Oprah unless they pledged their allegiance to Barack Obama. Since when did the Soviets start running campaigns? Oh, I forgot, this was a democrat speech.

Sorry Oprah and Obama, but I only pledge my allegiance to God, the flag and America, not a man.

Apparently John Edwards has no problem getting communists to endorse him. I thought Edwards was the “woman” of the people? Belafonte sure isn’t. He supports totalitarian regimes subjugating human beings as slaves to the leader they must vow their lives to—Chavez and Castro. Now he will help Edwards and his hair buy their way into the White House.

For what; frizz control?

We really know where Edwards stands on his politics. Next he’ll be accepting donations from Vladimir Putin and Slobodan Milosevic. Why stop with one communist; why not go for them all and really put the people in their place. That’s one way to get rid of those hideous trailers across the street—class cleansing.

There once was a time in our history when we the people chose the candidates of our own liking, not the candidates Hollywood demands for their own benefit. There once was a time when people actually read what the candidates stood for versus tuning into a talk show to
listen to a TV personality tell Americans who they should vote for.

Now Americans hang on the very whims of Oprah Winfrey’s endorsements. Of course Oprah wouldn’t waste her money building adequate schools for low-income Americans in the Eastern Kentucky Hollers where illiteracy reigns. Africans are needier than Americans and Americans have praised Oprah for her educating of children in another country versus her own. Now they
must ask her to whom they should vote as President of the United States: a white black man who’s done nothing for blacks.

If Oprah Winfrey told her viewers to vote for Steven Colbert, they would. Actually, voters would be better off with Steven Colbert than Barack Obama. At least Colbert is a fake phony
rather than a real one.

Of course Oprah will have to compete with John Edwards for whose mansion is the biggest and best for candidate parties. But Warren Buffet has more money. Enough to buy the Clinton’s new furnishings if they can steal back the White House.

And I’m sure Warren can afford to find the right upholsterer to make a dress for Hillary.

So I guess Hillary, who has complained about campaign finances, does not care if she is heftily financed. In 1996, two dozen people along with two corporations were charged by the FBI with election fundraising abuse (wnbc.com). These people were financing the Clintons illegally. Hillary pleaded the fifth 250 times when asked where the illegal funds came from
(wnbc.com).

David Rosen was charged with four counts of filing a false report with the Federal Election Committee after a big New York City concert raised $1.2 million for Hillary’s Senate Seat. $1.1 million was given to Hillary as “in-kind-contributions.” Rosen reported his donations as $400,000, but the FBI says the number is false (wnbc.com).

John Edwards spends that just on hair care alone.

Here are three so-called common people candidates—democrats; but they take money from the wealthiest of the wealthy while never doing anything to make a difference or change in the society liberals created to keep themselves wealthy and in power, and the poor in a continuous cycle of obligated need.

Lisa Richards

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards
www.lisa-richards.com
E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com