All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of the citizens of the United states; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, or liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor dent to any person within its jurisdiction the
equal protection of the laws.
Article XIV, Section 1. The Constitution of the United States
The above Constitutional Amendment is so easy to understand, a five year-old could interpret it to the five radical robed rogues on the Supreme Court bench who purposely misinterpreted the amendment to pacify non-citizen terrorist detained in Guantanimo Bay, Cuba.
As of June 19, 2008, the written ratified and codified law that has held strong for over 200 years no longer stands. The United States Supreme Court, the highest court in the land, bound to protect the Constitution of the United States and interpret it as it is so clearly written, and not interpret any article to one’s own personal beliefs, has been abolished.
No longer do the citizens of the United States have protection from terrorists hell-bent on murder.
One has to wonder which court handed down this ruling: the United States Supreme Court or the European Court of Justice, better known as the Eurocratic Court of Socialist Suckers and Stool Pigeons.
The 270 Gitmo Bay terrorists, whom liberal Washington whiners love to refer to as “detainees,” will now have the right to leap frog over military tribunals with their liberal-minded U.S. attorneys and enter U.S. Federal Courts in the Washington D.C. area like any American citizen accused of civilian crimes, receiving all rights to Habeas Corpus. The 270 terrorists will be allowed to call their own witnesses while demanding the U.S. government prove evidence of terrorist acts committed by the murderers of mankind.
The defense lawyers for the 270 terrorists claim the ruling will allow the doors to open to court challenges. Under the laws of the Constitution this decision is not only false but dangerous. The Constitution is written to protect American citizens, not put American lives in jeopardy by giving rights to terrorists from other countries.
The ruling is well received by liberals in Washington and around the U.S. who feel no violent criminal should be punished for crimes they were forced to commit due to the oppressive American government regime and constitutional freedoms laid out by a bunch of white men foolishly believing evil should be subdued and destroyed and life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness belongs to law abiding citizens. That’s what happens when a country accepts the
raving lunacies of Christians: we get law and order unfair to criminals.
Justice Antonin Scalia warned that “America is at war with radical Islamists, [and this Supreme Court ruling] will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed. The Nation will live to regret what the court has done today.”
Justice Anthony Kennedy stated in defense of the ruling: “The laws and Constitution are designed to survive, and remain in force, in extraordinary times.” Unfortunately the Constitution’s laws have been absconded with in an extraordinary way that no longer survives to protect American citizens.
President Bush who said he will abide by the ruling made known his disappointment with the verdict that places Americans in jeopardy: “It was a deeply divided court, and I strongly agree with those who dissented.”
The ruling handed down defends cases brought before the court by 37 Guantanimo Bay foreign terrorists captured on foreign soil plotting against the U.S. while killing U.S. service men overseas. The 37 Islamic murderers, along with their American liberal lawyers, claim innocence, demanding rights to challenge the U.S. in federal courts to the writ of habeas corpus—the constitutional right stating U.S. citizens held prisoner have rights to protest
their imprisonment before an independent judge.
These Muslim monsters believe they’ve done no wrong because their Koran dictates they “smite the heads of the unbelievers.” They are called to jihad against all non-Muslims and their liberal lawyers fully agree they should be free to live and kill as they please.
The 270 prisoners are non-U.S. citizens with links to al Qaeda. They are not being held on U.S. soil; Gitmo is Cuba, a wise choice of location by the Bush Administration impeding the federal court any access to terrorists captured after 9/11. Congress however has looked upon the president’s decision as cruel and unusual punishment, thus challenging Bush since 2001 on his pronouncement to confine prisoners in Cuba versus Leavenworth where they would receive
the same rights of U.S. citizens.
One of those men is Kalid Sheik Mohammad, henchman to Osama bin Laden who helped plot the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States. He now has been granted the same rights as American citizens he wants dead.
Poor little monsters; President took stopped their violent crimes against humanity by locking them up on a tropical sunny island where the U.S. military feeds them five start meals according to their Koranical diet, allows them prayer time, Koran reading, exercise, rest and relaxation while the military does all the hard work of keeping the place in tip top shape.
Two detainees demanding hearings against President Bush and the United States are Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Osama bin Laden’s personal driver, and Omar Khadr, a Canadian Islamic terrorist charged with killing a U.S. Special Forces soldier in Afghanistan. Despite their crimes, the three murderers above demand civilian court trials and immediate release to continue their terror.
Article XIV clearly states one must be a United States citizen in order to receive civilian court trials on U.S. soil. Nowhere in Article XIV does it state foreigners and enemy combatants held for crimes against the United States are allowed privileges or immunity. Nor does the article state foreign terrorists are allowed to enter U.S. courts receiving due process of the law.
American born terrorist Timothy McVeigh had all those rights under Article XIV to face judgment in a U.S. court; he was a citizen. The Guantanimo Bay terrorists are foreign born, they are Islamic terrorists whose goal was to attack the U.S. and murder its people; they have no rights to the federal court justice system. Enemy combatants must face military tribunal. Yet five justices have decided imprisonment for the past seven years has been inhuman torture despite the fact the terrorists live and eat better than those serving in the U.S. Military.
The Supreme Court ruling says military tribunals set up under the constitution for enemy combatants during wartime no longer stands as law. Those who commit war crimes against humanity and detained by the U.S. military now have all rights to challenge laws that have protected the United States for well over 200 years.
If tried and set free by liberal activist judges who feel murders have more rights than innocent citizens, Islamo-fascist terrorists will be free to go back to the Middle East and plot their foiled attempts once more and possibly succeed in making 9/11 look like a picnic.
Lisa Richards Copyright 2008 All Rights Reserved www.lisa-richards.com