From The Desk Of: LISA RICHARDS

Staff Columnists RMS Consultants Lisa Richards: a fire-breathing conservative who chews liberals up like a paper-shredder on over drive, spitting them back out like a wood-chipper, exposing every lie told to America by the left.

April 29, 2008

DOUGLAS DEMANDS ANOTHER ROUND FROM LINCOLN

Apparently the Lincoln-Douglas debate was not good enough the first time around; Hillary Clinton wants to reenact the 1858 debate.

Someone might want to point out to Senator Clinton that historical reenactments take place on battlefields. Besides, we already know how the Lincoln-Douglas Debate turned out and neither Clinton nor Obama are Lincoln. Although I would love to see the two reenact the Civil War with both candidates on the Confederate side; preferably in Atlanta with Sherman breathing down their necks.

Still, Hillary Clinton, who trails Obama in delegates, wants to debate Senator Obama Lincoln- Douglas-style before the May 6, 2008 Democratic Primaries in North Carolina and Indiana. In other words, Clinton wants a free-for-all one-on-one debate without moderator’s controlling her Grammy Award winning easy-to-tears acting and her shrilly Margaret Mitchell impersonations during defensive, rhetorical loss-of-control come-backs versus Obama’s questionably bitter slap-in-the-face descriptions of Middle America he uses to unite the all
white racist nation by-way-of his questionable affiliations with America-damning preachers and Washington bombers.

Obama declined the invitation, telling Fox News’s Chris Wallace he has debated Hillary “21 times” and is “not ducking” the invitation to a “contest,” because he said no. Obama told Wallace “For two weeks, [and in] two big states, we want to make sure we’re talking to as many voters on the ground, [and] taking questions from voters [and] not…hav[ing] debates between now and Indiana."

That’s too bad because I hear Hillary Clinton is quite the avid duck hunter.

Now we’re all left to wonder how the reenactment of Lincoln versus Douglas would turn out in 2008. I’m wondering if perhaps Bill Clinton warned Obama off, being the victim himself of many lamp-to-the-head injuries by a woman who must always have things her way if one wants to live to see the next day with their shoes on.

After 21 debates what could these two Democrat-Socialists possibly have to argue over that America has not seen and heard over the last very long year and a half? They both stand for Universal Healthcare; both support welfare, free education, despise wealthy people despite being in that class, and prefer stealing from the rich to give to those living off taxpayers they feel don’t pay their fair share.

I would like to know how many tax exemptions Reverend Wright gets.

Notwithstanding Hillary’s attempts to court the South and Mid-West, like Obama, she is anti- Second Amendment: both candidates want to take guns out of the hands of law-abiding Americans while letting violent criminals continue getting their wrists slapped like naughty children after shooting innocent Americans with illegal weapons.

Obama voted against a bill that would give the death penalty to gangs in his home state; so we know where Obama stands on punishing violent killers and terrorists who blow things up—the same place as Hillary Clinton who was close friends with Yasser Arafat.

Both candidates want taxes raised on the upper-class—that would be the people who hire Americans. Regardless of what both candidates claim, they will in fact raise taxes on the middle-class in order to give lower-income, welfare-“earning” Americans more free money to live off. Democrats never give tax breaks, the prefer tax-takes.

Obama is running on the fact he claims to be the first black presidential candidate; Hillary is married to the first black president. The Clintons invented themselves as the modern day Kennedy’s; Obama and Michelle have done the same—without hair bands, lesbians, dead men, and molested women.

Hillary Clinton once insulted women who bake chocolate chip cookies and stand by their men as some form of weakness; Obama insulted rural Americans as bitter gun-owners clinging to God.

Bill Clinton on the other hand did cling to his unused Bible every Sunday.

Both candidates are married to exemplary paradigms of American pride: Obama’s wife referred to whites as “the Great White Oppressors” in her college thesis and declared this year is the first time in her 40+ years she is proud of America. Bill Clinton was so proud of America as a youth, he refused to fight for America, dodged the draft, and ran off to England to attend Oxford University where he learned to smoke pot without inhaling.

Obama on the other hand did inhale and alleges to cocaine use. At least liberals are consistent with their drug use.

What more could Hillary possibly debate Obama on? They’ve discussed every issue they stand which are nothing more than a European Union socialist agenda to turn America into a welfare state further beholden to the government democrats would increase in size. Hillary has already told Obama she, unlike Obama, would have distanced herself from men like Wright and Farrakhan. Of course one must forget her long-time friendship with Jew-killer Yasser Arafat and her college affiliation with the Black Panthers.

Hillary made it clear to the press she disagreed with Obama’s comments to the people of Pennsylvania despite the fact she wants rip guns out of the hands of all law-abiding.

The only difference between Hillary and Obama is he is half black and Hillary is half pseudo- Jew. Other than that both have radical affiliations—Weathermen, Panthers, and Mena, Arkansas drug dealers—and both are as phony as Jimmy Carter pledging his allegiance to the American flag.

If another democrat debate was to take place, the only one worth watching would be that of Michelle Obama debating Bill Clinton on which one of them would make the best First Lady. Both have spouses who insult America and both think they’re above everyone. Michelle is the oppressed-by-whites lady who is willing to stand by her man and support whatever he wants and Bill is the oppressive lady’s man who consistently competes for media attention by standing on his wife’s platform as if it’s his own.

And both are married to men.

The fact is Hillary and Obama already reenacted the firing on Fort Sumter in every debate; both have shot themselves in their feet shoved in their molars so often it’s pathetic to watch. Basically there’s nothing left to watch. Unless the of course the two would agree to gloves and a ring and go at it like real men. Then we would finally have a political debate people would watch.

BACK TO HOME PAGE